How My Beliefs Broke My Diet
By Paul Piotrowski on Sep 11, 2007 in Spirituality, Health and Fitness
This is going to be a somewhat unusual post by me. I normally don’t like writing articles presenting a problem. I prefer to write articles presenting a solution to a problem once I’ve actually already solved it. However, today I felt compelled to share my problem even though I have no solution yet. Maybe someone else can relate.
Here’s my “problem” summarized. I have all the tools, the knowledge, the resources and know-how of how to eat healthy, what to eat, how to exercise, how to work-out etc. I am certified as a sports nutrition consultant so I can tell anyone what they need to eat in order to have optimal nutrition for the sports they are participating in etc. I have a home gym setup with a treadmill, an elliptical machine, a bowflex, freeweights etc. I have the money to purchase and prepare foods that are healthy and I have no doubt that I know which foods are healthy and which aren’t.
The “problem” is that I can’t seem to identify a reason to do it. I am healthy, I haven’t been sick with anything for over two years (no cold, no flu, no allergies, no pains, nothing). Yesterday at 2am I had a giant piece of cake that my wife made and I drank a coke before going to bed. It didn’t even phase me. The only difference for me between eating crappy and eating healthy is that I naturally gravitate towards the 195lb range when I eat like crap and I gravitate towards the 175lb range when I eat healthy.
I think the reason I’m getting “stuck” is that unlike some other people out there who get things like cancers or diabetes or aches or pains or headaches or whatever from eating like crap, I don’t really get any of those.
To add fuel to the fire, I’ve been reading a lot of books that dive into the spiritual side of things a lot in the last few years and I constantly run into a similar train of thought. To illustrate let me quote a sentence from Joe Vitale’s new book “Zero Limits”. On Page 166 Joe describes an evening out with Dr. Hew Len. They went out and Dr. Len ordered a big burger with meat, cheese on a white bun. Joe was stunned. He asked Dr. Len “Aren’t you worried about the cheese and meat and bread?” to which Dr. Len answered “Not at all. I have a chilli dog every morning for breakfast. I love this stuff.” … “It’s not the food that is dangerous,” he explained to Joe “It’s what you think about the food.”
I’ve heard similar messages from others, such as Deepak Chopra and other teachers. I think where I’m having problems is that I actually do believe them. I totally agree that it is only our belief that the foods we eat are bad for us that makes them bad for us. So then I think that is why I’m having such a hard time sticking to a “healthy” diet, even though I know “scientifically” that it is healthy.
I mean, it doesn’t take a genius to know that eating whole, live foods is better than some greasy burger right? But is the burger really bad for you, or is it only bad for you because you believe it’s bad for you?
When I was 19 years old I went to a doctor for a physical check up. She said I was as healthy as a horse. I used to play hours and hours of sports every week, but I ate like crap. I ate chocolate bars, drank slurpees and didn’t really care what I ate. However, at the time I had no interest in proper nutrition, eating healthy, worrying about cancers or anything. I just ate food because it tasted good. Then as I got older I started hearing about healthy foods and non-healthy foods and what’s good for you and what’s bad for you, etc. Now I’m not sure anymore. Was I healthy because I was young? Was I healthy because my doctor was an idiot and didn’t know the truth? Or was I healthy because the thoughts of cancer, tomours, bad foods, trans fats, saturated fats and stuff didn’t even enter my mind?
Has anyone reconciled this link between the spiritual belief of “it is so because we believe it to be so” and how it fits with diet? I’ll keep seeking answers, but just wanted to know if anyone else out there had this “issue”.
Tags:beliefs, diet, nutrition, spiritualityPopularity: 46% [?]
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
NOTICE: If you enjoy my writing, you may want to visit my new Blog How to Make Money Doing What You Love - InspiredMoneyMaker.com as well.





























Paul-
Interesting thoughts. I have never come this far in my thinking, because I get so stuck on wanting to eat “healthy” with the primary purpose of losing weight. I think if I were at an ideal weight and didn’t struggle with that aspect, I would definitely have a difficult time finding the motivation to eat healthy.
Sorry I don’t have any answers for you, but I do find this concept interesting to think about.
Thanks
Brooke
Brooke | Sep 14, 2007 | Reply
Well if you honestly ask me, i don’t think that you have to worry about your health and what you eat as far as you are active and if you continue to be the same you don’t have to go on diets that is an honest appeal.
Personal Growth | Sep 20, 2007 | Reply
Yes, you were healthy because you were young!!
Bad food does damage to a body gradually over time. I have no idea how old you are now - I’m going to guess 30? - but watch out for age 40, that’s when the body starts to break down from years of abuse!
I also need to eat much healthier, it’s hard to break bad habits, even with aches to motivate!
Jan | Sep 20, 2007 | Reply
I also read Joe Vitale’s book and noted Dr. Len’s comment. I’ve also struggled to reconcile eating “healthy” with my belief that it doesn’t matter what I eat, it only matters what I believe. Unless I become an expert manifestor and an expert at LOA, I wouldn’t try to eat “unhealthy” just yet.
Leon | Sep 24, 2007 | Reply
I must admit, it’s something I’ve thought about too.
You read about (say) how Americans have high incidences of heart disease etc and so we get told “don’t smoke, don’t drink alcohol, choose low-fat options” etc etc but then you have the French who apparently DO smoke & drink & eat fatty food and in fact have lower incidences of heart disease, bowel cancer etc.
And while it could be that the French eat in moderation and drink red wine and so on, I’ve always wondered whether it wasn’t partly because the French weren’t as *neurotic* about food.
I know all these scientists are just trying to encourage health & well-being but all this conflicting information not to mention people spruiking extreme diets like raw foodism etc - we just invest so much time & energy overthinking our diets and trying to qualitatively decide if what we are eating is good or bad and feeling guilty as a result - all this anxiety can’t be healthy.
I mean, you have vegans who think dairy & meat are evil, now there are raw-foodists who think cooked food is evil not to mention those atkins people who think carbs are evil… There’s so much guilt & judgement wrapped up into what should be a simple, pleasurable activity of just eating.
Good food is one of the pleasures of life and I’m certainly not going to give up entire classes of food for the possibility of some empirically unproven marginal improvement in my life. Like most things, I think the ‘middle way’ of moderation is the best. And certainly the least mentally taxing!
Maxine | Jan 22, 2008 | Reply
>>> Was I healthy because I was young?
Yes, I think this was probably the case. The young body is inherently healthy, and then it gradually deteriorates.
quirkyalone | Jan 22, 2008 | Reply
What does your body say about the junk food you eat? Does it really like it or are you “eating from the neck up?” The book One Bowl deals with this.
IMHO low quality thinking attracts low quality food.
Andrew | May 8, 2008 | Reply